Nationalism today
Today, I saw two very
interesting videos. The first one was by Makarand Paranjape to JNU students on
nationalism (Makarand Paranjape at JNU). The second was Bharka Dutt’s response to Anupam Kher on the
Telegraph National Debate.(Bharka Dutt at the Telegraph National Debate) It was such a delightful experience listening to two
sane voices. Importantly, both of them have tried to provide a meaningful
context for the nationalism debate.
Here I have attempted
to provide my own interpretation of the ongoing debate.
We have on the saffron
corner, the right wing RSS and Hindu outfits, who’s advocacy of Hindu
nationalism borders on authoritarianism. Nationalism to this group has very
narrow definition and has a bias towards Hindu nationalism. Their friends BJP,
sitting very close to them, have a more economic agenda. Unfortunately ,
elements in their team subscribe to the Hindu nationalist agenda. The BJP
economic agenda is openly free market and at times in conflict with the
economic agenda of the Hindu nationalist.
On the opposite Red
corner, sit an insignificant left minority, that has lost all democratic
sanction. They are historically, opposed to the Hindu nationalist and refuse to
accept a popular mandate of the government. They oppose not nationalism, but
Hindu nationalism and see Hindutva agenda behind every thing done by RSS/BJP.
They are also completely opposed to the economic policies of the government,
despite the fact that their own economic policies have brought ruin to the only
2 significant states ruled by them.
Beside them sit a
motely group, who’s only shared interest is opposition to BJP. The erstwhile
Congress rulers can take unchallenged credit for all the success the country
has had and all the mess this nation is. The economic policies are so much
closer to BJP, that you will see continuity of policies (though the mother and
son duo leading them have no economic understanding and subscribe to socialist
agenda). The other partner in this corner is the socialist grouping characterized
by open casteist formations. The economic agenda is stated as socialist, but is
more self serving than social serving. This entire grouping has a social agenda
broadly called secularism and with a strong tilt towards social justice for
their individual caste groups. The secular agenda states that you can seek
votes in the name of caste and community as long as the word Hindu community is
not used.
And then there are
neutral and not so neutral observers. A small fraction of the press is controlled
by the RSS and does its bidding (including transmitting doctored video’s). The
vast majority of the press is congress controlled and promotes any agenda that
will discredit BJP and has been at the forefront of the intolerance debate.
Then there is a well-entrenched intelligentsia in Delhi, who would like us to
believe that they are neutral. The communist have successfully denounced anyone
not subscribing to their philosophy as pseudo intellects and have dominated
campuses such as JNU.
In all these noise,
the true challenge of this nation is lost. The true challenge of this nation is
how do we remove social inequities, a very hindu religious mismanagement that
goes back many centuries. It includes Hindu muslim divisions that trace their
origin to pre British era. To believe that both these issues can be solved
without bringing religious leaders into play is plainly stupid. I firmly
believe that politics and politicians will only complicate this issue and will
never solve this. Meanwhile, let the politics be truly secular; which truly
means, no influence of religion on governance. Meaning that the constitution is
above religion and has no religious influences. Meaning there are no stupidity
such as cow slaughter or pork bans. Meaning that government doesn’t involve in
religious matters, such as administering temples. Let government focus on
creating economic opportunity and upliftment. Let the government mandate
religious leaders to come up with a solution for addressing social justice
issues within say 6 months, basically a roadmap to dismantle manuvad.
Comments